EXPLOITATION
IS USE

Animals are not ours to use

WATCH: WHAT IS VEGANISM?

Watch Video

WHAT IS
VEGANISM?

The Principle

Veganism is a doctrine that rejects the exploitation of animals for any purpose.

It's about rejecting the belief that animals exist for human use—as property, resources, or commodities.

When we say "don't exploit animals," we mean "don't use animals."

"The word veganism shall mean the doctrine that man should live without exploiting animals." — Leslie Cross, Vice-President of The Vegan Society, 1951

This is not a diet. This is not about perfection. This is about animal emancipation.

EXPLOITATION
≠ KILLING

EXPLOITATION MEANS USING SOMEONE FOR YOUR OWN BENEFIT

Common Misconception

  • Veganism is about not killing animals
  • It's about reducing harm
  • Focus on suffering
  • Perfection required

The Reality

  • Veganism opposes USE of animals
  • It's about ending exploitation
  • Focus on commodification
  • Principle, not personal virtue

Critical Understanding

  1. You can exploit animals without killing them: Taking eggs from hens, riding horses, shearing sheep for wool, using animals for entertainment. All exploitation, even without death.
  2. You can kill animals without exploiting them: Accidentally hitting a deer with your car isn't exploitation—you weren't using them for your benefit.
  3. The root issue is USE, not death: When animals are viewed as property and resources, all forms of exploitation follow naturally.

WHAT VEGANISM
ISN'T

NOT A DIET →

Most people think veganism means "not eating animals" or following a "plant-based diet." This misses the entire point.

Veganism is a moral stance against animal exploitation for ANY purpose—not just food. A fully plant-based diet is just ONE outcome of this stance.

Someone can eat 100% plant-based but still exploit animals through clothing, entertainment, cosmetics, and more. They wouldn't be vegan—they'd be plant-based.

"CROP DEATHS THOUGH" →

This argument completely misses the point and creates a false equivalence.

Incidental deaths during crop harvesting ≠ animal exploitation, using them as resources for human benefit.

Veganism isn't about crop deaths—it's about the commodification of animals. What do crop deaths have to do with leather, zoos, animal testing, horse riding, or the pet industry?

NOT ABOUT "REDUCING HARM" →

Veganism is about NOT EXPLOITING animals—not about preventing all harm.

Human existence inevitably affects animals through agriculture, construction, transportation. Veganism never pretended to eliminate all incidental harm.

The key difference: EXPLOITATION vs. INCIDENTAL HARM

Veganism opposes the intentional use of animals as tools, commodities, and resources—not all instances where animals might be harmed.

THE GOAL:
EMANCIPATION

Veganism is not about welfare or making exploitation "more humane"—it's about LIBERATION.

Just as we recognize that human slavery is fundamentally wrong—not just "cruel" when conditions are bad—veganism recognizes that treating animals as our property and resources is fundamentally unjust, regardless of how "well" they're treated.

10-25%
Critical Mass Needed for Social Change
1951
Original Vegan Principle Defined
1979
When Definition Was Diluted
"Veganism is essentially a doctrine of freedom. It seeks to free man and animal from bondage to a false belief—the false belief that man has the moral right to use his fellow creatures for his own ends." — Leslie Cross, 1951

THE DANGEROUS
DILUTION

In 1979, the definition was changed from a clear principle to something negotiable.

Original (1951):

"The doctrine that man should live without exploiting animals."

"The object of the Society shall be to end the exploitation of animals by man."

New Definition (1979):

"A philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose."

Why This Matters

  1. "As far as possible and practicable" makes exploitation negotiable. It transforms veganism from a principle into a flexible lifestyle where convenience determines morality.
  2. You would never apply this logic to human rights. We don't say "don't exploit children when it's convenient." Fundamental moral principles don't have qualifiers.
  3. It allows endless excuses. Everyone draws their own arbitrary line based on what's "practicable" for them, rather than what's right for animals.
  4. The original definition was clear: End the use of animals by humans. Period. No qualifiers. No excuses. Just the simple recognition that animals deserve emancipation from human use.

THE QUESTION
IS SIMPLE

Do you recognize that animals deserve freedom from exploitation by humans?

If the answer is yes, then you're vegan. Everything else flows naturally from that principle.

This isn't about being perfect. It's not about reducing suffering or minimizing harm. It's about recognizing a fundamental truth:

ANIMALS ARE NOT OURS TO USE

WITNESS THE SYMPTOMS (but remember: the root issue is USE, regardless of harm)

Watch Dominion

READ THE ORIGINAL FOUNDING LETTERS & ETHICAL FRAMEWORK

Leslie Cross Archive

TEST YOUR UNDERSTANDING

Take the Quiz